Research/Experimental protocol
Experimental protocolDraft · 9 October 2026 · Revision 2

Relational Bayesian Inference for Musical Pleasure: An Experimental Protocol

Read protocol PDF ↗
Draft

Recruitment, preregistration and ethics review are pending. No human results are reported. The current PDF is the version.

Abstract

Can a listener’s response to a question about familiarity or expectation improve the prediction of their subsequent musical pleasure? This protocol proposes a test within Musical Intelligence (MI), using a fixed audio representation and a Bayesian observation model with a persistent listener state. History, direct pleasure reports and auxiliary responses enter separate comparisons, allowing the contribution of relations between tasks to be estimated on the same listening trajectory. Predictions are committed before each listening block and evaluated on later reports. A conditional Gaussian example establishes when an auxiliary observation can reduce predictive uncertainty, while a wrong-sign example shows how an incorrect relation can worsen prediction. The experimental design couples this comparison to a separate, controlled search for associations beyond the dimensions already labelled as pleasure-related. It specifies stimulus provenance, temporal alignment, model controls, held-out source families and simulation-based planning. The personal inference layer and experiment are proposed extensions; the figures show source-audited architecture, analytic calculations and synthetic examples, not participant results.

Figure 1. Audited audio representations and a nine-mechanism pleasure subgraph, followed by a proposed personal inference layer using history and task responses to predict future pleasure.
Figure 1 · Audio representation and the proposed listener model. (a) The nine R³ groups contain 97 channels. Counts describe the inspected implementation. (b) The selected pleasure subgraph has nine mechanisms, 103 outputs and six declared relay edges. DAED and RPEM have no edges within this selected graph; this does not imply isolation in every configuration. (c) History and task responses would update a personal posterior downstream of the fixed engine. The F4 memory-labelled computations currently use audio-derived inputs; persistence across sessions requires an additional observation and storage layer.

Version history

The record stays at this address. Each PDF preserves the version cited.

  1. Draft · Current

    Replaces the Learning the Listener editorial draft with a continuous experimental protocol: revised methods and five composite figures. Original PDF, unchanged.

    Cite this version ↓
  2. Draft

    Learning the Listener: A relational Bayesian experiment for musical pleasure, personal memory and discovery across dimensions

    Initial draft in this library. PDF title metadata aligned with the cover; text and figures unchanged.

    Cite this version ↓
Underlying architectureMusical Intelligence